Was It The Decade of Greed?

80's BMW, Mercedes Benz and Jaguar
Photo By Kieran White of Manchester, England: Some Rights Reserved

The 1980’s are often referred to as the “Decade of Greed”. Do you know what people spent more money on than cars? More than what they spent on gold watches? What opulent purchase exceeded what they spent on dining, travel, clubs and even consumer debt balances? Charity.

A Need Met and Journalist Challenge

This week a friend of mine and I spearheaded a flash fundraiser for a college student studying art. The need was a powerful laptop that can run specific software. Due to various circumstances this was not in financial reach for the young person and a semester and future was on the line.

In less than 24 hours we were able to raise over $2000 so this kid could get what he needed to continue a path as he struggles to rise above poverty and achieve dreams with talent and hard work. All he needed was a little boost. He got it!

As the fundraiser gained momentum and we knew it was going to succeed, I assumed something like this would have never happened in the “decade of greed”. Boomers and yuppies and suburbanites helping others? Nah! I set out to write a hit piece on my favorite decade. I found out my assumptions were wrong.

A Decade of Generosity

According to a 1992 National Review Article by Richard McKenzie:

“In the 25-year period prior to the “Decade of Greed,” total charitable giving, in real terms, more than doubled, increasing from $34.5 billion in 1955 to $77.5 billion in 1980–or at a compounded annual growth rate of 3.3 per cent. Between 1980 and 1989, total giving in real dollars expanded by 56 per cent to $121 billion, or by a compound growth rate of 5.1 per cent. The annual rate of growth in total giving in the 1980s was nearly 55 per cent higher than in the previous 25 years.”

Broken down to per capita giving, in 1987 we were at $486 per person in the U.S. That would be over $1,300 in purchasing power today. But what about today? In 2023 we were at $481 per person. In 1987, that would have been $169 per capita.

Our current decade started with a rise of luxury goods purchases of $281 billion, up from $247 billion the prior year. Charitable giving? In 2020 and 2021 we were starting to get more generous with an increase of over 3%, but in 2022 we decreased by over 10% and continued that downward trend in 2023.

Green Peace Stranger at the Door

One night in 1986 I was sitting in my grandparents’ living room doing homework. There was a knock at the door. A young man in his 20’s with long red hair, scraggly beard, headband, and torn jeans was at the door. He had credentials and a clipboard and introduced himself as a representative from Green Peace.

My grandmother let him in and my grandfather made a pot of coffee as the man sat down in our living room. They would spend the next hour and a half having a conversation. He told them about what Green Peace did and what was at stake. They asked him questions about the threats to the oceans and environment and what is and is not possible.

At the end of the conversation my grandparents had a hushed conversation with the checkbook open. They agreed on an amount and gave him a check and collected their receipt. I do not know what the amount of the check was, but as he wrote the receipt I could see emotions on his face and he expressed genuine gratitude for the time, the coffee, and their generosity. As he got set to leave my grandfather gave him a firm handshake and thanked him for what he and his group are doing for a better world. My grandmother told him which neighbors would likely give and which ones were a waste of his time.

What We Have Now

Today we have information at our fingertips. Many of you are reading this column from a supercomputer that fits in your pocket. No one has to come to your door and with a few clicks you can instantaneously help others. But it seems while we are adding to cart, we are not adding to the social equity at the same rate as people once did.

Why?

Why was the decade of my teens so generous? I am not an economist. Even the author of the National Review article did not know, but hoped that someone would do a deeper dive one day. Challenge accepted. I will be working on an investigative report on the matter.

In the meantime, here are some personal hypothesis.

Wall Street! There were more tax incentives to give to charities in the 80’s. When some of those incentives were removed between 1988 and 1989, corporate giving dropped. There was also a PR factor. If you were a larger than life personality of wealth, to be seen as a philanthropist was a badge of honor. For some, that badge of honor was, and still is, a defense when facing accusations of fiscal impropriety.

Main Street! The 1970’s was a struggle for most middle class people. Record high inflation at the time made the dollar worth less. As the 1980s saw an increase in opportunity people may have remembered what it was to struggle and wanted to help others. It was not just opulence on Wall Street. The current credit rating system did not exist yet. Affordable housing was easier to obtain. A shoe salesman in a shopping mall could afford a house in the burbs. College did not require six figure loans with terms Vito Corleone would not be comfortable offering to people.

When people have more, there is less need. And the need that does exist, people want to give. But I also think there is a cultural factor.

The Crassness of today’s “Compassionate”

In a previous article in Gen X Watch, “Who Are You? What is Gen X Watch?” I wrote about the beauty and the beast of nostalgia. “Nostalgia is comfort. But it also has the danger of being idealized and becomes a mask for who we really are and what we really experienced. ” I want to be very careful not to idealize the 80’s, but there is something I see today that I did not see then at the level of toxicity. Self proclaimed progressive minded people who poor shame and punt needs to others.

In the flash fundraiser for the young college student and the ongoing GoFundMe for a widower and his child there is a disgusting backlash fueled by keyboard courage. Because of my own social bias I would expect it from people on the other side of the social and political fence I am on, but I am seeing the crassness from my tribe.

There are people who treat those in need as if they are stupid. In the last decade every time I ask for help for someone in need, a cast of characters send links to things they just googled for 2 minutes. The arrogant assumption here is that people in need are too ignorant to try to resolve their own problems.

The punting is fascinating as well. If it is a grass roots social media campaign people say it should be on a GoFundMe. If it is on a GoFundMe, these people should be using government aid and not be asking for handouts. They are allegedly too lazy to seek out the avenues of aid out there.

Then there is the shaming. Like asking a rape victim what they were wearing when they are sexually assaulted, others pontificate on what these people did wrong to end up the circumstance they are in. They get offended that their social media even has a request for help. The sick part is that the people in need can read what these people are saying.

I cannot help everyone in need. If I am being honest, there are some charities or needs that I do not wish to support for various reasons. That is my prerogative and fiscal reality. It is everyone’s. But kindness and decency is something we all should aspire to.

When I was a teenager in the 80’s, I did not see this manner of cruel response from people to those in need. Oh, it existed. It has always existed. But today, it seems more prevalent to be cruel. It is a bi-partisan trait.

But these marginalized people that you spit on as they try to change their worlds are immune to your consultations. They’re quite aware of what they’re going through.

Want to Help Like it’s 1987?

I have information below about a family in need. Also, I need your support in this work. Keep reading and be the difference.

A Small Difference You Can Make Right Now That Will Change Lives

Photo of Erika with a cat

Erika died on Christmas leaving behind a family that has immediate needs.

Click here to read the story of how Erika saved my life when we were teenagers.

Click here to donate to the Gofundme a friend and local PRIDE organizer set up to help the family Erika was taken away from

Support Gen X Watch!

There are three ways you can do this:

1. Share this story with a friend and leave a comment.

2. Tip me! I do not have a contract with anyone in this work and for it to continue I need support.

3. Become a Members Only Patreon! In the Patreon I will have unfiltered rants, exclusive content, free PDF copies of the upcoming quarterly magazine, and more.

Thank you for your support and taking the time to read this.

Stay Totally Awesome! Stay true to you.

12 responses to “Was It The Decade of Greed?”

  1. Arlene Avatar
    Arlene

    I feel this with every ounce of my being. I remember when I needed help due to my cancer treatments (I still owe MD Anderson over $8000). I needed to start a GoFundMe account to help pay for my treatments because the deductible and out-of-pocket were too high for me. I had gobs of people “educating” me on how I could recieve financial assistance. I had already applied for all of their suggestions, but I was denied assistance for various reasons. I didn’t have it in me at the time to push for further assistance. Heck, with insurance Gleevec (chemo pill) was going to cost me $5000 a month for a 30 day supply. I told the specialty pharmacy, “I guess I’ll dying because I cannot afford that on a teacher’s salary.” Thankfully, I was able to recieve a scholarship for Gleevec, but if I needed it past a year, then I would have been flat out of luck.

    1. Pat Green Avatar

      That is horrible!

      People need to stop being doctor google and thinking they are helping with their fucking links. They are dweebs and dorks and not as totally awesome and they think they are!

  2. Mark Boyd Avatar
    Mark Boyd

    In addition to legitimate fears (the strong possibility of WW III, snd AIDS), and manufactured ones (Satanic Panic, anyone?), there was an innocence and a sense of hope in the air. There was a feeling that one could make a difference…that if you flapped your wings hard enough, one could move worlds. That innocence has been replaced by cynicism “The money/materiel never goes where it’s needed”, and the hope replaced with resignation… The fear remains though…evergreen

    1. Pat Green Avatar

      Oh wow! You just hit on some things that gave me pause! I think you have something here with the juxtaposition of optimism and doom.

      And one that touches a nerve on a pet peeve of mine. When I used to work in the NFP sector I was always challenging the idea that 98 cents of every dollar HAS to go to the cause and overhead is evil.

      Case study after case study conclusively shows that when you allow NFPs to operate as businesses do, they do better for the cause. When you pay talent well, you get better talent. When you market and advertise you get a broader reach and even though less money of every dollar goes to the people in need, more dollars are raised and more money ultimately goes to the ones in need. Not by a little, but by a lot.

      Why on earth would a top talent professional work for an NFP for pennies on the dollar of their worth to barely make ends meet when they could go work for a for profit corporation, support their family, live well, and give to organizations at a greater level of raw dollars to the cause AND get a tax deduction?

      In the greatest ironic gesture, groups fighting for fiscal fairness pay their staff below scale and farm out a lot of free labor to unpaid interns.

      Rant over. Your comment was awesome and your perspective appreciated.

      1. Ruth Avatar
        Ruth

        Pat, check out Vu Lee and Nonprofit AF. He’s been doing great and interesting work on these very things (and not in a vacuum).

        As a former fundraiser, I’m happy to donate to overhead. It’s my job as a giver to vet an org’s values, programs, and practices. After that, I trust the staff to know where that money is needed. And if I learn that something is out of sync with my held values, then I move that money somewhere else.

        I’d be curious to see if the numbers for giving today properly take into account direct giving via crowdfunding platforms and, even more directly, via mutual aid like we did through Venmo, etc. A lot of people my age (millennials) give directly to individuals versus organizations. I certainly am not getting tax breaks on a significant chunk of what I give.

        Also, the philanthropy article fails to address how much foundations have “saved for a rainy day” that they didn’t unleash during a global pandemic, much less anything else.

        I might be a tad cynical about all of this, but I suspect there’s a lot of giving unrepresented in these reports. Mutual aid and the way members of struggling communities help each other off the books.

        1. Pat Green Avatar

          Before I continue, I want to first recognize and thank you for your taking the time to read and to comment. More importantly I am here to also thank you for the advocacy you do for others and I think you are a bad ass in a world of wannabes. The rest of this is to ask for clarity, contextualize what this is and is not, and hopefully diffuse, but if it ignites there are gonna be a lot of f bomb and trouble which is either good for reads or death to them. That shit is like tap dancing in a minefield…think there was an episode of MASH with a minefield. ANyway…to your wonderous comment.

          Which philanthropy article are you referring to? One of the sources I cited or hyperlinked to? If it is my article you refer to, you need to hold some aspects lightly. My style has been since 2004, what is referred to as Gonzo Journalism and has been my approach since 2004.

          Gonzo journalism is a style of journalism that is written without claims of objectivity, often including the reporter as part of the story using a first-person narrative. It is a first-person writing style in which the author is a protagonist (or antagonist depending of the reader), and it draws its power from a combination of social critique and self-satire (middle aged steve harrinton looking back while talking about now).

          Gonzo journalism and accuracy is delightly clouded by reporting of personal experiences and emotions, in contrast to traditional journalism, which favors a detached style and relies on facts or quotations that can be verified by third parties. Gonzo journalism disregards the strictly edited product favored by media and strives for a more personal approach. The personality of a piece is as important as the event or actual subject of the piece. Use of sarcasm, humor, exaggeration, and profanity is common but not necessary. My personal heroes were the ones who exposed me to the medium when I was in high school. Hunter S Thompson and Mike Royko.

          “If I’d written the truth I knew for the past ten years, about 600 people—including me—would be rotting in prison cells from Rio to Seattle today. Absolute truth is a very rare and dangerous commodity in the context of professional journalism.”-Hunter S THomspon

          Truth and accuracy in this topic, you seem to have pointed out is always going to be fuzzy as there are aspects that have nuance.

          In my case the point of this article is to show that to call the 80’s a decade of greed because of a few bad players is myopic as there were other things going on. In any time of prosperity there will always be ass-clowns fucking things up for themselves. Just read any F Scott Fitzgerald book and we will have representation of bad actors in the 1920’s. Additionally, it is my hope that people stop being assclown fuckwads to people who are struggling and approach them with kindness and have a modicum of respect for human frailty. In the process of the fundraising, a progressive white woman in her late 30’s made a GenZ at risk person cry and want to give up. I do not hold that against white people, women, or Mels. She is a horrible person who needs to suck toe jam while recalibrating her moral compass.

          Back to the area that you feel might be lacking. My primary sources for today were a sloppy and unholy amalgamation of the Library of Congress Research Guide database, Lily Family School of Philanthropy, and Nonprofits Source. In regard to the per capita modern spend I chose the most generous of the calculations so as to be less cynical and may have added in a dash leaning towards the Mels since they were the highest donating demo the last 2 years to make today a little less bleak than some of the other numbers hit.

          The past was based primarily on Library of Congress and The August 31, 1992, issue of National Review which is a limited subset. But it was enough for me to say, “Holy shit, maybe we were not as self centered as we thought we were.” It turns out the etymology of the the term decade of greed is mainly Oliver Stone and a pissed off Time Magazine columnist. We all just ran with it. More on that for the Patreons backstage pass where I get into more of the facts and figures and inspirations just for them. They pay me so they get that right and my accountability and time.

          Finally, because Hunter is a hero, I cannot promise I was not high. I can neither confirm nor deny that.

          Later this week I have an interview slated with one of the leading financial advisors in the US and Canada for the more investigative report but I am also working on an investigative report about why the 80’s sax left pop music and that is more important to me right now. Because someone killed the sax and I wanna know why and so do my 12 readers!

          I am not here to speak in a generational divide and if that is what you took away in your defense of mels, then I need to know where I was not more clear on my core mission which is to use nostalgia as a vehicle to encourage people of my Gen to do better now with a side mission of celebration of Gen Z who is the primary driver of the current popularity of all things 80’s. But even then they have a different perspective that is fascinating. Golden Girls, 16 Candles, and Breakfast Club seen through the queer lense of Gen Z is a fresh, scholarly investigated, and bad ass new view that I hope to introduce X and Boomer and Mel to as I am currently watching Miami Vice through…and by the end of season one…Crockett is totes bi and it is awesome.

          Before expenses I currently make $91 a month from 15 patreons and $10 in tips from the tip jar since this started last momth. After expenses I am making less then $1 USD an hour on this venture so I have limited bandwidth. This is why the upcoming magazine has 2 contributing writers and my creative teams includes a CNN producer and a news editor for PBS to ensure the ethics are safe and I am trying to stay true to my style of op/ed (Gonzo) as opposed to falling into the trap of being something I am not. My point to that bit is to simply say this.

          You see something that could be better, you are free grab a mop and clean. You are welcome and invited. I am always willing to do editorial updates to current content if I miss a beat on my beat.

        2. Pat Green Avatar

          Oh..and Vu Lee and Nonprofit AF if now a bookmark to look into.

  3. Dùghlas Avatar
    Dùghlas

    reading this triggers (in a good way) some memories. about ten years ago, i came across a Ted Talk entitled The Way We Talk about Charity is Dead Wrong. The speaker talks about the ‘big business’ of charity, and how we shame them for spending too much on overhead and rewarding them for ‘how little they spend — not for what they get done’ A documentary has since come out called UnCharitable. I haven’t seen it yet, but the story you describe contrasts the generosity of then versus the uncharitableness of now.

    The other thing i think about is a book entitled The Hole in Our Gospel. I haven’t read it, because I left Christianity a few years afterward purchasing it. the tl;dr is ‘The hole in our gospel is that we forget the poor. We become obsessed with other parts of our religion, tangled up in living the perfect, “American Christian” lives. Go to church, volunteer in Sunday school, follow all the rules.’ Ultimately, this is one of the reasons I left Christianity, particularly the Pentecostal/Evangelical variety of my upbringing.

    We love to give charity, because of how it makes us feel, not the impact of that charity. We forget the humanity of those in poverty.

    I share this after reading the post, before reading the comments.

    1. Pat Green Avatar

      Ruth (another commentor) feels the current time frame may be more generous than the stats suggest. And I am interested to know more about that.

      But like what you pointed about charity, it is not the point. The point is that regardless of where we are at, we need to keep upping the game because people are suffering and dying right now and it is about them and not us.

      I saw that ted talk too and it is important. We need the grassroots stuff and we need the big dogs…and we need relief.

      Why is giving less? Is because we have less? Is the data skewed by underground giving? I dunno. I will find out in an investigative report after I get down to the whole what happened to the Saxophone thing.

      My policy is to never read the comments, but in the case of Gen X Watch, every comment has been great so far. Even the one I removed because it was a romance scanner was funny and had a great pic.

      1. Dùghlas Avatar
        Dùghlas

        that makes sense about the data potentially being skewed. i love the idea that giving may have gone underground, especially when i think about what Jesus purportedly said about giving.

        ‘when you give, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret.’

        this has more poignancy for me now that I don’t believe in the divinity of Jesus. for that means there is no heavenly accountant keeping track of the secret giving. it’s becomes untrackable good done for the sake of doing good. we need a wholf lot more of good done for goodness. i hope i’m making sense, i’m tired from working overnight last night, now with a migraine because the cool LED kitchen light is on, and I am incatacitated.

    2. Jeanine Avatar
      Jeanine

      I’m one of your Boomer friends so my adult observations (and it’s just MY observation) spans from the 70’s until now. The perspective in the 80’s was a stark contrast between the era of WWII and Vietnam and the sudden availability of advertising, MTV, etc. – things that didn’t exist before fueled a desire for ‘things’ but the parents of that generation could still remember leaner times and limited life choices so they were more receptive to helping others. I’ve noticed in my own life that those who have lived without (or still do!) are more likely to share with others. We know that what others consider “poor” decisions are often the best choice one has at the moment. Currently I’m dismayed that too many people see the availability of immediate communication as an excuse to say the ugly thoughts out loud. This colors our perception of things and causes doubt and mistrust and a biased view that is at often odds with reality and data in many areas. People who feel threatened and or unsafe will act like a caged animal; the fight response is not logical – it’s the primitive brain struggling to survive. As a therapist I get it. Add in greed or learned bias (racism, homophobia, etc.) and you have the mess that is 2024. But I’m a believer in community and while my tribe may not be as vocal as others, we quietly live our lives in support of others. My hope is that the voices of myself and my friends will pierce the darkness and inspire others. My Nana pushed the envelope in her time and was remembered for caring about others at both the macro and micro level. I can only hope my life will be seen in the same light because the truth is this – we only have control over the choices we make, including how we treat those less fortunate.

      1. Pat Green Avatar

        Thank you so much for your perspective and as a therapist I hope I see more of your perspectives!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *